Subjective Well–Being as a Function of Playfulness and Self–Forgiveness

Authors

  • Hetika Dhakkan Student, Mithibai College of Arts, India, Maharashtra, Mumbai, India
  • Anika D’souza Student, Mithibai College of Arts, India, Maharashtra, Mumbai, India
  • Sanyukta Jichkar Student, Mithibai College of Arts, India, Maharashtra, Mumbai, India
  • Umamah Arzoo Khan Student, Mithibai College of Arts, India, Maharashtra, Mumbai, India
  • Srushti Moonot Student, Mithibai College of Arts, India, Maharashtra, Mumbai, India
  • Zaynab Patel Student, Mithibai College of Arts, India, Maharashtra, Mumbai, India
  • Shreya Shah Student, Mithibai College of Arts, India, Maharashtra, Mumbai, India
  • Riva Suri Student, Mithibai College of Arts, India, Maharashtra, Mumbai, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25215/1002.072

Keywords:

Playfulness, Self - forgiveness, Subjective Well - Being

Abstract

The present study is based on the theoretical framework of Adaptation and Coping mechanism of Subjective Well Being, where Playfulness is seen as an adaptive mechanism and Self- Forgiveness is seen as a coping mechanism. The study included Indian students aged 18-25 years. Participants (N=256) completed Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) for subjective well-being, Heartland Forgiveness Scale (HFS) for Self-Forgiveness, and Other-directed, Lighthearted, Intellectual, and Whimsical (OLIW) scale for playfulness, administered online. Pearson Correlation was used to analyze the obtained data. The results indicated a significant low positive correlation among playfulness, self – forgiveness and subjective well – being. A non – significant low positive correlation was seen between a type of playfulness and Subjective well – being.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2022-11-05

How to Cite

Hetika Dhakkan, Anika D’souza, Sanyukta Jichkar, Umamah Arzoo Khan, Srushti Moonot, Zaynab Patel, Shreya Shah, & Riva Suri. (2022). Subjective Well–Being as a Function of Playfulness and Self–Forgiveness. International Journal of Indian Psychȯlogy, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.25215/1002.072