Emotional Intelligence and Self Perception Among Young Adults: A Comparative Study

Authors

  • Ishita Kapoor Student, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Dr. Mohammad Imran Assistant Professor, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25215/1102.184

Keywords:

Emotional Intelligence, Self-Perception

Abstract

Emotional Intelligence was devised by Salovey and Mayer (1990). Is the capacity to perceive and have a command over our feelings and those of others, and utilise something very similar to lead our contemplations and feelings so it is ideal for individual and the environmental factors close to him/her. EI has been seen as a significant part of individual and master accomplishment, as individuals with additional critical levels of the ability to comprehend people at their center will by and large have better intuitive capacities, more grounded associations, and more conspicuous strength despite stress and trouble. Self-Insight is a singular’s point of view on his or herself or any of the mental or real properties that contain oneself. That is one technique for taking a position at it, yet according to a power perspective, self-wisdom is something past how we view our “natural self”, it is a significant viewpoint in transforming oneself into a productive pioneer. The point of the review is to concentrate on the distinctions in sexual orientation in Capacity to understand people on a deeper level and Self Discernment among youthful grown-ups. The size of the review was 120 young adults. The apparatuses utilized for the review were Self Perception Measuring Scale device by Dr. KG Agarwal estimates self-impression, and the Emotional Intelligence scale by Schutte which estimates the capacity to understand people at their core of individuals.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2022-11-05

How to Cite

Ishita Kapoor, & Dr. Mohammad Imran. (2022). Emotional Intelligence and Self Perception Among Young Adults: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Indian Psychȯlogy, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.25215/1102.184