Different Opinions of Sexuality and Sexual Education in Individuals with Intellectual Disability: A Literature Review

Authors

  • Sharon Ebenezer Raj Student, Amity University Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Poorva Chavhan Student, Amity University Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25215/1102.293

Keywords:

Sexuality, Sexual Education, Intellectual Disability

Abstract

Previous studies have found that individuals with disabilities are more than twice as frequently sexually abused than those without. Among various disabilities, intellectual disability is particularly challenging due to its nature, severity, and complexity. This article aims to explore different perspectives on sexuality and sexual education for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). It examines the viewpoints of parents, teachers, and the individuals themselves. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of the existing literature on sex education for people with ID and diverse opinions on the topic, a thorough evaluation of social science databases from 2015 to 2022 was conducted. The research sample comprised 14 articles. The review underscores the importance of collaboration among parents, teachers, and individuals with ID to establish an empowering and well-informed environment for sex education. It highlights the significance of using age-appropriate and accessible materials, promoting inclusivity, and establishing support networks. By addressing the specific needs of individuals with ID in sex education, we can enhance their overall well-being and foster a more inclusive society. It is crucial to encourage open and non-judgmental discussions, provide resources, and offer training to parents and teachers to ensure effective sex education for individuals with ID.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2022-11-05

How to Cite

Sharon Ebenezer Raj, & Poorva Chavhan. (2022). Different Opinions of Sexuality and Sexual Education in Individuals with Intellectual Disability: A Literature Review. International Journal of Indian Psychȯlogy, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.25215/1102.293