Navigating Complexity: A Critical Analysis of Leadership Development Programs for Academic Heads in Indian Higher Education

Authors

  • Sujeet Kumar Yadav Research Scholar, National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration (NIEPA), New Delhi, Delhi.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25215/1401.192

Keywords:

Academic Leadership, Higher Education in India, Leadership Development, NEP 2020, Training Evaluation, Capacity Building

Abstract

The transformative agenda of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 places a premium on effective academic leadership as a critical lever for change in Indian Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). This has spurred the creation of national capacity-building initiatives such as the Leadership for Academicians Programme (LEAP) and the Malaviya Mission. This paper presents a critical analysis of the underlying design and delivery of these flagship programs. Through a conceptual review of policy documents and program architectures, this study evaluates their alignment with established leadership theories and, more importantly, the unique socio-cultural and administrative fabric of Indian academia. The analysis uncovers several disconnects, including a heavy reliance on theoretical models that are not sufficiently adapted to India’s high power-distance context, a pedagogical approach dominated by passive knowledge transfer over experiential learning, and a conspicuous absence of a robust framework for evaluating long-term impact. The paper argues that for these programs to transcend their current limitations and genuinely cultivate the leadership capacity required by the NEP, a fundamental redesign is necessary. It concludes by proposing a shift towards context-driven, experiential learning models underpinned by rigorous, multi-source evaluation mechanisms.

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Sujeet Kumar Yadav. (2026). Navigating Complexity: A Critical Analysis of Leadership Development Programs for Academic Heads in Indian Higher Education. International Journal of Indian Psychȯlogy, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.25215/1401.192